Pages

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

The Brinko disciplinary file: I report; you decide.

To enlarge, click on page once then again after it pops back up.

7 comments:

  1. looks like a bunch of he said she said to me

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr Stein will eat this up. Brinko is/was not a City of St. Marys Employee, therefore the city's policy does not play a role in this matter. But if you have ever worked for local government, you would know that they make everything look like the way they want it to look or read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anyone can say that. What can you bring to the table to substantiate your claim that she was not a city employee?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Let's see if I get this correct. Stein makes a records request for an answer that was supposed to be given to him on getting another hearing officer. He gets a response that it is a personnel matter and the City Attorney will have to look to see if there is an answer. Then you make a request and get information from Janet's personnel file. Sure as hell sounds like the malfeasance Stein accussed them of.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They're not the samed. Mine was a freedom of information request for certain existing documents. Stein's was a request for an answer in a legal matter. Different rules altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  6. St. Marys City Council strikes again:

    Until Brinko told them, nobody on the tourism board was aware that the City Council had asked for local legislation that would have allowed it to reappoint a new tourism board. Because state Sen. Jeff Chapman, R-Brunswick, refused to sign it, the legislation never came up for a vote.


    Question of the Day: Was/Is Janet Brinko a employee of the City of St. Marys or is she an employee of the Tourism Board?

    ReplyDelete
  7. The correct ansewer is,of course, neither one.

    ReplyDelete

Please keep it clean and reasonably civil. "Public figures" are fair game, consistent with the "actual malice" exception. I suggest you Google both terms before you go off half-cocked.