Monday, October 19, 2009
Watchdog Debate
I'll not be going tonight, but if someone wants to make post debate comments, here's a place to do it. I'm not so sure that the Watchdogs can be considered unbiased moderators. Too many of their founders are running. Hell, their president is Cyphers' campaign manager. I will be at the Eagles' forum however - even though I already know who my choices are in each race.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Very unbiased event. Haney was impressive, she knows her stuff. Cyphers did a good job. It was obvious who the partnership candidates are. I am glad I went.
What was the format? Did the audience submit written questions via the moderator, or what?
Could you give us an example of what haney knew her stuff about?
You say it was obvious who the partnership candidates were. Was it equally obvious who the Watchdog candidates were?
The audience submitted questions to the moderator. The watchdog candidates were not obvious. I am not sure who they are. The president stated he was not necessarily voting for watchdog candidates.
Haney had good response to the airport question and understands the economic development options. She spoke to the crowd with enthusiasm.
Feller was a no show, and did not make the Sub Base tour either. Is he actually running??
Anon #23
Written questions submitted by the audience. From what I saw Haney was in Greg Bird's corner.
Anon #23
Thanks to all for the info.
Could the author of this statement please expand on it?
"Haney had good response to the airport question and understands the economic development options. She spoke to the crowd with enthusiasm."
Feller is running but mostly on TOPIX, Kingsland, apparently.
Post a Comment