Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Ponder, if you will, the quality of the typical TOPIX mind which came up with this piercing question.
Marion
Kingsland, GA
Reply »
Report Abuse
Judge it!
#117
11 hrs ago
Politics wrote:
Jay is going to find the answer to the most relevant question. Could the taxpayers save more by having a consolidated insurance plan for all city and county workers.. Don't you need the facilities and resources?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
What does that mean.....
Typical jabbowocki idiocy of Marion "Church Lady" Wall. He is so full of irrational hatred for me that he puts his pious moth into gear before his sycophantic, mush brain is fully engaged. He is trying to convey that I did not anticipate the ostensible new facilities and expenses that would be associated with covering all city and county employees under the county's self insured health plan (once we have at least three commissioners with the balls to make the long overdue changes to the ridiculously overgenerous plan as it is now).
Let's analyse the idiot's criticism, shall we? So, on a future day certain, all city employyes would be covered under the county plan and not their old city plans. It would no doubt happen on the first day of a month. No doubt the premiums would be different. Oh, the horrors! Someone at each city would have to get on the computer and change the amounts deducted from each covered city employee's paycheck for health insurance. Of course, this is well within the capabilities of the existing payroll software of each city. Whereas before the switch, the cities would either be cutting a check or electronically transferring the combined employee monthly premuim payments to the city's health insurance carrier. Now, they would have to cut the check or transfer the funds to the county. Oh, the logistical nightmare! The expense! The extra "facilities!" Thank you, Church Lady, for saving us all from a grave error!!
Post a Comment